On this page
The Odds API is often the first odds service a developer meets, because it has been around for years and its REST model is easy to learn. pinnodds is newer and narrower: it exists to relay Pinnacle's prices after the public Pinnacle API closed. The two overlap only where Pinnacle appears in The Odds API's bookmaker list. This page compares them on data focus, transport, drop detection, pricing transparency and fit. For the wider field see the alternatives comparison.
pinnodds has published its own comparison at pinnodds.com/the-odds-api-alternative. It is worth reading, with the obvious caveat that it was written by one of the two parties. Our facts about pinnodds come from its public docs and plan endpoint; facts about The Odds API come from its public site, and we write "see provider" where we could not verify a detail.
At a glance
pinnodds trades breadth for depth and push delivery; The Odds API trades depth for breadth and simplicity. The table lays out the consequences.
Scroll for more
| Criterion | pinnoddsOur pick | The Odds API |
|---|---|---|
| Data focus | Pinnacle only: live, prematch, specials, quarter lines | Many bookmakers, Pinnacle among them |
| Transports | REST, SSE, WebSocket (add-on on some plans) | REST polling |
| Drop detection | Server-side: REST buffer and SSE alert stream | No; diff snapshots yourself |
| Quarter lines and props | Included on every plan | See provider for Pinnacle-specific depth |
| Trial | Free key, no card; 3-day full-speed demo | See provider |
| Pricing | Public plan list; from $99/mo | See provider |
| SDKs | Official Python and Node.js | Community and provider examples; see provider |
| Link | pinnodds.com | the-odds-api.com |
Data focus: one book or many
The Odds API returns prices from many bookmakers in one response, which is ideal for comparing operators and finding discrepancies. pinnodds returns only Pinnacle, but returns all of it: the full live and prematch board per sport, alternate lines, period markets and special markets, at the same depth on every plan.
Which is better depends entirely on the question you are asking the data. "Where is the best price on this match?" is a multi-book question and The Odds API answers it directly. "What does the sharpest book think the fair probability is, and how has that changed in the last minute?" is a Pinnacle question, and it needs depth and speed on one book. Many modelers treat the Pinnacle price as the reference for that second question; pinnodds links the reasoning in Why use Pinnacle odds as fair value. If you rely on The Odds API for Pinnacle, confirm how much of the Pinnacle ladder it carries beyond the main markets.
Transports: polling vs push
The Odds API is a polling service: you request a snapshot and pay for it from a quota. pinnodds supports polling with delta cursors as well, and adds two push transports, an SSE stream of drop alerts and a raw WebSocket that relays every upstream price frame.
For a dashboard that refreshes every few minutes, polling is fine on either service. For anything that reacts to a price move, the difference is large. With polling, your reaction time is your polling interval plus request latency, and shortening the interval eats quota. With push, the change arrives when it happens. pinnodds' polling rate limits run from 20 requests a minute on the trial and Stream plans to 10 or 30 requests a second on Pro and Scale; the SSE stream is included on Stream, Pro + SSE and Scale, and the raw WebSocket is a paid add-on on eligible plans. One concurrent SSE or WebSocket connection is allowed per key. Our polling versus push guide covers how to choose, and pinnacleapi.dev/sse has a working stream consumer.
Odds-drop detection
pinnodds computes drops server-side and exposes them through a REST buffer with minimum-percentage and age filters, and through an SSE stream that pushes each qualifying drop with its no-vig price. The Odds API does not do this; you store previous snapshots and compare them yourself.
Writing your own detector over a polling API is a well-understood job, but it couples your detection granularity to your polling budget, and it means maintaining state for every selection you watch. A server-side buffer moves that work to the provider. If drop alerts are the reason you want Pinnacle data at all, this single feature will probably decide the comparison. The mechanics are described in How to detect odds drops, and an end-to-end alert bot is walked through in Build a betting odds alert bot with Telegram and SSE.
Pricing transparency
pinnodds publishes its complete plan list on an open endpoint, which is why we can state that paid plans start at $99 a month and that quarterly and semi-annual terms are discounted. The Odds API publishes its plans on its own site, and we point you there instead of quoting figures we cannot verify at build time.
Both services offer a free way in. pinnodds issues a trial key without a card and includes a 3-day full-speed demo with SSE. For The Odds API's free tier and quotas, see the provider. Our pricing page renders the live pinnodds table and maps plan tiers to workloads.
The two services also meter usage differently, which affects any cost comparison. pinnodds limits REST calls by rate, per minute on the smaller plans and per second on the larger ones, and charges nothing per pushed event. A polling-only service typically meters a monthly request quota, so the cost of watching a market closely rises with how often you poll it. Work out how many requests your design needs per hour on each model before you compare monthly prices.
Who should pick which
Pick pinnodds if your project centers on Pinnacle: drop alerts, fair-value models, closing-line-value tracking, or anything that needs Pinnacle's alternate lines within seconds of a change. Pick The Odds API if your project compares many bookmakers and can work from periodic snapshots.
Choose pinnodds when
- Pinnacle is the reference price in your model.
- You need to know about a drop within seconds, not minutes.
- You want quarter lines and specials without extra cost.
- You are replacing code that used the old Pinnacle API; see the endpoint mapping.
Choose The Odds API when
- You want many bookmakers in one normalized response.
- Periodic snapshots are sufficient for your use case.
- You value a long track record and a very simple REST model.
- Pinnacle main-market prices are enough, or Pinnacle is not your focus.
Using both is a reasonable pattern: The Odds API for the cross-book view, pinnodds as the fast, deep Pinnacle reference. Try the free tier of each against the same match and see which questions each one answers. Get a free pinnodds trial key, then the get-started page gets you to a first request in a few minutes.